Studying the chemistry of space leads us to more tangible science, writes Helen Sharman
The two discoveries in November – of an alien planet in the Milky Way and the youngest black hole ever found – will provide scientists and astronomers with a wealth of new information.
Of course the black hole is not really young in itself: being 50 million light years away means it must have been around at least 50 million years ago for us to ‘see’ it and it may not even exist at all by now.
Black holes are only called black because they neither emit nor reflect light visible to the naked eye. X-rays, however, do come out of black holes so we use X-ray detectors to ‘see’ them.
Nevertheless, we can tell what the black hole was like only 31 years after it was born, a mere blink of time compared to its life expectancy.
If the black hole is a baby, then the alien planet is a senior citizen of the universe: it’s a few billion years older. We have known about planets orbiting stars other than the Sun for some time. What is special about this alien planet is that it is the first one we have detected that has come from another galaxy.
The Milky Way’s gravity pulled in the planet and now we have the chance to compare it and its star with the younger, indigenous stars and planets closer to home.
Star HIP 13044 (as it has been named) has a very different composition to that of our Sun, which contains mostly hydrogen and helium with significant amounts of oxygen, carbon and iron.
If a star in the Milky Way has more of these heavier elements, it is statistically more likely to have orbiting planets. Until now, the theory has been that the star and its planets coalesce from whatever material is in that area of space. If the material is rich in heavier elements, there is a greater chance of some being left over to form planets.
HIP 13044 contains very little of the heavier elements, destroying the theory that stars like it have no planets. Assuming that the alien planet formed from the same material as its star, it should be quite different from any planet we have found before.
How can stars be so varied? The two lightest elements, hydrogen and helium, were the first to be formed in the Universe. Older stars were made of just these two elements. As stars died the immense energy of supernovae fused these light atoms into heavier elements such as oxygen, carbon and iron, which then became part of newer stars.
Stellar chemistry bears little resemblance to chemical processes on Earth. The temperatures and pressures inside stars change the ground rules regarding chemical bonds. However, we know what is in a star because of the electromagnetic spectrum we detect coming from it.
Chemists catalogued spectral lines of the elements in the early 19th century by heating materials until they glowed and using a spectroscope to examine the light emitted. This helped astronomers to decode stellar spectra and it remains the method for assessing the make-up of stars.
In the same way, astronomers have found something interesting about the quantity of lithium in different stars. If a star has orbiting planets, it tends to have very little lithium compared to stars without planets. It has been suggested that as planets orbit the star, they enhance the convection of material inside the star. The convection moves the lithium to hotter regions where the star uses it up as fuel.
We have come a long way since chemists discovered that each element emits its own distinctive spectrum when heated. That research was not done in order to study the stars, nor for any other application, yet spectroscopy has developed and now it is used in areas as diverse as medicine, forensics and manufacturing.
In times of austerity we should not forget that scientific research forms the basis of our future economy. Atoms are invisibly small and the distance to HIP 13044 is incomprehensibly large. Chemistry bridges the gap.
blog comments powered by